|
Post by shezza on Nov 4, 2006 16:55:43 GMT
I know this sounds like a stupid question, but just humor me for a minuet please. Does anyone think that there is much of a sound deterioration if any, when copying from Mini Disc to mini disc. The reason for this question is that instead of making original back-up disc's for gigs, I could just copy straight from one original Mini Disc. Yes I know I could make a copy and compare it myself, but you know what it's like when you are doing something yourself and comparing, you're just trying to find a fault/deterioration etc. ...............Pete.
|
|
levi2
Full Member
Posts: 667
|
Post by levi2 on Nov 4, 2006 17:48:49 GMT
well thats what i do i first record a track on what i call my library disk i dont use this for stage work Then when i make my disks for stage i just copy them off the library disk
|
|
|
Post by shezza on Nov 5, 2006 16:44:22 GMT
Thanks for the reply levi2,I am also thinking that it will be easier to get the volume of the tracks more in line with each other.
|
|
levi2
Full Member
Posts: 667
|
Post by levi2 on Nov 5, 2006 20:20:44 GMT
Shezza if you use the digital cable it should record at exact same volume
|
|
|
Post by guilty on Nov 5, 2006 23:43:33 GMT
I record direct to Mini Disc then record it again to my library disc. Any other time I need to copy I use the digital cable to copy from one player to the other. Keep in mind the copy you just made cannot be digitally copied again. As for loss of quality in analog copies I hear none myself. Remembering in the 80's most of our backing tracks were on cassette tapes using Dolby NR. We've come a long way with technology.
|
|
midimart
Advanced Senior Member
Add me as a friend on Facebook
Posts: 2,783
|
Post by midimart on Nov 6, 2006 10:23:13 GMT
Just a thought.....
Why not keep all your masters on the PC... (Inc a backup) and just record direct from PC... Much easier and also you can set different sets... Like one for Xmas, with all your Xmas gigs on and one for All your summer season etc etc and then just record to minidisc as you need them...
I'm probably just thinking out loud but that's what I would do...
|
|
levi2
Full Member
Posts: 667
|
Post by levi2 on Nov 6, 2006 11:24:00 GMT
midimart i know what you mean but you would have to record twice each time ie on to minidisc and then to pc then convert to mp3 to save room. Its just a pity the rack mount sized minidisc players dont do mp3 coz that would be great. just record all your tracks to pc convert to mp3 then when you want a track on a minidisc you just download instead of realtime recording.So upto now all track i do are recorded onto a backup disc and when i make a disk with sets on i just record em form backup. I`m just waiting for a mp3 player rack mount size with hard drive to come out with a nice big display. there is a HIFI called HARD FI by wharfdale selling at argos with a 40 gig hd in i would like to try that but dunno if theres a line out theres not much info on it
|
|
|
Post by rockabilly on Nov 7, 2006 8:26:51 GMT
Hi Being an IT type - the mini disc stores data digitally as does CD's etc. The beauty of this is that absolutely no degradation of the material being copied (unlike Video or cassette tape copying where it degrades each and every time your record off of a copy from the original).
The quality of the original recording is where the quality counts - I follow MidiMarts style and use a good old 3.5" historic disk (still digital but unreliable) to play through my Casio CTK-731.
Rockabilly
|
|
|
Post by shezza on Nov 7, 2006 14:26:16 GMT
:)Thank's for all reply's.......Pete.
|
|